Skip to content

Carbon removal

How a biochar carbon credit project moves from biomass to issuance

A plain-language guide to feedstock, production, end use, records, independent review, credit issuance, and buyer readiness.

CarbonPod Research5 Aug 20269 min read
Indian biochar project team reviewing production and carbon project records

The credit begins with an eligible project

Biochar can create durable carbon removals when eligible biomass is converted under controlled conditions and the resulting stable carbon is placed in an eligible long-term use. But a physical tonne of biochar is not automatically a carbon credit.

Verra VM0044 v1.2 is active from 27 June 2025 and applies globally to eligible waste biomass converted at new biochar production facilities, subject to its complete applicability, additionality, monitoring, end-use, validation, and verification requirements. VM0044 v1.2 is also listed by the Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market as CCP-approved.

1. Screen the feedstock and facility

The project team must establish feedstock origin, eligibility, competing use, sourcing controls, moisture, transport, storage, and chain of custody. Facility status, technology, operating permits, design capacity, commissioning date, energy use, coproducts, safety, and actual run-rate also matter.

An early screen should identify any condition that makes the current methodology unavailable before development costs grow.

2. Establish additionality

VM0044 v1.2 added an investment-analysis requirement to demonstrate additionality. The project needs a documented counterfactual and a credible case that carbon finance changes the economics or implementation pathway. This work must be grounded in contemporaneous evidence rather than reconstructed after commissioning.

3. Design the monitoring system

The monitoring plan connects operational reality to quantification. It covers feedstock measurement, production batches, energy use, biochar quantity, sampling, laboratory analysis, transport, end use, losses, uncertainty, data controls, and record retention.

Good monitoring is not a quarterly document collection exercise. It is embedded in operating routines, contracts, quality processes, and staff responsibilities.

4. Prepare validation

The project description, methodology application, baseline, additionality, safeguards, monitoring plan, stakeholder requirements, and evidence are assessed by an independent validation and verification body. Questions and corrective actions are normal. The operator and project partner need a disciplined response process that can trace every answer to a record or approved decision.

5. Monitor, verify, and seek issuance

After the monitoring period, the project prepares a monitoring report and evidence pack. Independent verification tests the reported outcome and methodology compliance. Registry review follows. Only after successful completion of applicable steps can credits be issued.

Issuance volume and timing can differ from early forecasts because of operating performance, eligible feedstock, laboratory results, deductions, data gaps, methodology interpretation, and independent review.

6. Prepare for buyer diligence

Issued credits still face questions about project governance, community and environmental safeguards, additionality, permanence, feedstock, end use, monitoring, ratings, claims, and delivery risk. Commercialization materials should match the registry record and clearly distinguish forecast, verified, issued, sold, and retired quantities.

A credible biochar partnership plans for diligence from the first feedstock receipt, not after credits appear on a registry.

Back to insights